Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1736607

Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked infrastructure

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 6:57 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:

> On omaps, each bank is a separate driver instance with it's own
> interrupt. Maybe really all we need to do is get rid of the "bank"
> naming, I think that's left over from 15 years ago when we did not
> have separate driver instances. It seems we should s/bank/ddata/
> on the driver to avoid confusion.

OK sorry maybe OMAP is not a target for this, I just thought so
since it was one of the platforms that is patches in the patch
series.

But I'm pretty sure we have chips with banking like this: separate
interrupts but a single device. I would have to read through them
all I guess.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked infrastructure Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-09-14 16:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked  infrastructure Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> - 2017-09-15 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked  infrastructure Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2017-09-15 19:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked  infrastructure Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2017-09-16 00:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 00/16] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration and banked infrastructure Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-09-21 14:10 +0200

csiph-web