Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec

From	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec
Date	2017-09-20 13:40 +0200
Message-ID	<urLwd-2qd-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <ur04j-3Pu-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <urpFn-5m4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ursDg-7av-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <urtfY-7CA-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <urIym-u2-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 09:24:43AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2017, Mark Brown wrote:

> > It really helps if we can get the earlier parts of the series moving
> > even if the rest of it's in review still - I know I back off on
> > reviewing things if it looks like their dependencies aren't making
> > progress.

> Just for your FYI, I tend to review my parts then wait for the
> rest of the series to be reviewed, then discuss how the set should be
> handled.

> Holding back on reviewing your parts is not a good idea.  If everyone
> did that we'd end up in a circular Maintainer dependency and nothing
> would ever get reviewed.

I get fed up with having to re-review the same patches over and over and
over again while people work out what's going on with the earlier parts
of the series, that gets very time consuming and is error prone.  If
we're getting churn early on in the series that's causing things to
change then it's better to let that settle down and look properly at the
results than glaze over looking at each minor change as it comes in and
miss other things that get tweaked.  Once the dependencies are stable
then it becomes worthwhile again.

Thread

[PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr> - 2017-09-13 21:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-14 09:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-14 18:10 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-18 11:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-19 14:20 +0200
          Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-19 17:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-19 17:30 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-19 18:10 +0200
            Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-19 18:10 +0200
              Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-20 10:30 +0200
                Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-20 13:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v7 2/8] mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2017-09-14 09:50 +0200
  Applied "mfd: wm97xx-core: core support for wm97xx Codec" to the asoc tree Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-19 18:20 +0200

csiph-web