Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode_operations

From	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode_operations
Date	2017-09-20 10:40 +0200
Message-ID	<urII2-xz-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uq9jj-2d7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uq9jj-2d7-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <urlBM-1m7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <urxCV-1Jf-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:39:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Do we really ever pass anything other than struct acpi_device to
> ACPI_COMPANION_SET() as the second arg?

No, and we should not accept anything else than acpi_device either.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[PATCH 0/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode_operations john.hubbard@gmail.com - 2017-09-16 02:40 +0200
  [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode_operations john.hubbard@gmail.com - 2017-09-16 02:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate  fwnode_operations Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-18 13:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate  fwnode_operations Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-19 10:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate fwnode_operations "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-09-19 22:50 +0200
        Re: [PATCH 1/1] acpi: unbreak ACPI_HANDLE(), encapsulate  fwnode_operations Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-20 10:40 +0200

csiph-web