Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732050
| From | Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review |
| Date | 2017-09-14 07:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <upv2y-UJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <upjkL-1Jw-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <upl3b-2DF-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uplmy-2Zr-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <upny4-4iM-61@gated-at.bofh.it> <uprV0-7hc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 04:18:03AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 02:30:46PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Yes. I don't recall if it is a direct --force or if you would have to > > > remove the original tag first (with git push <repo> :refs/tags/<tag>). > > > > Ah, but then if someone had pulled the old tag, they would have to > > delete it locally before they can pull in the new one. That's the main > > reason I'll not do this... > > In fact not, the tags are automatically replaced upon pull. I've been > using such a crappy workflow for some time in the past, sharing human > errors with coworkers... Git is pretty tolerant to this. It's just > that it's terribly confusing because you can then have two people with > the same tag name pointing to different commit IDs, I really hate this, > it only works when all users are in the same office and you shout > "sorry I messed up, I'm pushing the tag again". > > > Again, use the make command that we have just for this reason... > > It also has the benefit of always reporting the same version for all > users including those only downloading the -rc patch. > It reports the same version, but it is not necessarily the same code. There are cases where a rc is updated, but not the Makefile. That happens quite a lot, actually. This is similar to mainline, which currently claims to be v4.13.0 until -rc1, then it claims to be -rc1 until -rc2, and so on. Guenter
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-12 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 10/14] Bluetooth: Properly check L2CAP config option output buffer length Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-12 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 02/14] mtd: nand: qcom: fix read failure without complete bootchain Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-12 19:20 +0200
[PATCH 4.9 14/14] NFS: Sync the correct byte range during synchronous writes Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-12 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Shuah Khan <shuahkh@osg.samsung.com> - 2017-09-13 02:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org> - 2017-09-13 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-13 05:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Tom Gall <tom.gall@linaro.org> - 2017-09-13 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-09-13 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-13 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-09-13 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-13 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-13 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-09-13 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-09-13 23:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-14 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> - 2017-09-14 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-09-14 07:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2017-09-15 01:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2017-09-13 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4.9 00/14] 4.9.50-stable review Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> - 2017-09-13 16:40 +0200
csiph-web