Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1732511
| From | Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent |
| Date | 2017-09-14 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <upHn4-e8-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <upDCO-6hR-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <upFXY-7Vl-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <upG7E-7Yy-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <upGhk-81E-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <upH3H-7A-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:28:30AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 10:33 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >> a) uglifying the 15 or so relevant inline asm locations with ifdefs; or > > > > Actually I guess we could put the "sp" in a macro... I'll try it. > > Exactly. Do something like > > #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > # define EXTRA_ASM_CLOBBERS "rsp" > #else > # define EXTRA_ASM_CLOBBERS > #endif > > and then replace the nasty > > register void *__sp asm(_ASM_SP); > .. > "+r" (__sp) > > games with just that EXTRA_ASM_CLOBBERS thing at the end of the clobbers. > > Yes, you'd probably have to document that the alternative_call_2() > thing doesn't take a "input" argument, but a input_and_clobbers, but > all users do that anyway. > > I dunno. There's also alternative_call(), which doesn't yet have the '__rsp' annotation, but it probably should. It has some callers which pass clobbers and some which don't, so its conversion would be trickier. So my plan is to keep patch 3 of this series, which clarifies those alternative macro interfaces, and also separates the inputs from the clobbers. That'll make it really easy to add something like EXTRA_ASM_CLOBBERS above. In fact I'll probably keep patches 1-3, because they're all improvements. Then I'll replace the original patch 4 (ASM_CALL) with the "sp" clobbers thing. -- Josh
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-14 16:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-14 19:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-14 19:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-14 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-09-14 20:30 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-14 20:50 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] x86/asm: Make alternative macro interfaces more clear and consistent Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2017-09-15 18:20 +0200
csiph-web