Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1728999

Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff

From Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff
Date 2017-09-08 16:50 +0200
Message-ID <unsLw-8nP-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <un3WN-8h1-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <un4pP-8qv-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Hi Peter,

Thanks for your answer.

On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:40:33PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:16:19PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > One thing worth noting is that we couldn't reproduce the issue with a
> > 4.13. We can't bisect really easily due to the amount of patches that
> > we still have on 4.9 and have all been merged since, but it seems like
> > the bug was fixed (either on purpose or as a side effect), and was
> > never sent to stable. Looking at the history of kernel/locking/mutex.c
> > during that window didn't really show anything obvious though.
> > 
> > If you have any ideas or spot something very wrong, I'd be happy to
> > hear about. Thanks!
> 
> Well, we did a _complete_ rewrite of the mutex primitive in v4.10-rc1.

Ok.

What commit happened to be the rewrite? 9d659ae14b54 ("locking/mutex:
Add lock handoff to avoid starvation") ? We backported this one and
3ca0ff571b09 ("locking/mutex: Rework mutex::owner"), and still can
reproduce the issue. Is there any other?

> Part of the reason for that rewrite was fixing a starvation case, but
> for that you'd need to actually have contending usage, which you claim
> not to have.

Yeah, we're close to the opposite case :)

> Aside from that I really can't remember any specific issues with the old
> code (4.9 is such a long time ago). You could try to disable the
> optimistic spinning code, see if that helps.
> 
> You did also say you were running on an ARM64, there were a few memory
> ordering fixes like for example commit:
> 
>   50972fe78f24 ("locking/osq_lock: Fix osq_lock queue corruption")

We're running on ARM, not ARM64 (they still are separate architectures
under arch/, unlike x86), but I'll look into them too.

Thanks!
Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

mutex_lock issues during poweroff Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-07 14:20 +0200
  Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-07 14:50 +0200
    Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2017-09-08 16:50 +0200
      Re: mutex_lock issues during poweroff Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-08 18:20 +0200

csiph-web