Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1728537
| From | Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock |
| Date | 2017-09-08 04:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <unh3H-vE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <un5vA-A2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <un96a-3hI-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 09/07/2017 11:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 07:26:23PM +0530, Prateek Sood wrote:
>> Remove circular dependency deadlock in a scenario where hotplug of CPU is
>> being done while there is updation in cgroup and cpuset triggered from
>> userspace.
>>
>> Process A => kthreadd => Process B => Process C => Process A
>
>> Process A
>> cpu_subsys_offline();
>> cpu_down();
>> _cpu_down();
>> percpu_down_write(&cpu_hotplug_lock); //held
>> cpuhp_invoke_callback();
>> workqueue_offline_cpu();
>> wq_update_unbound_numa();
>> kthread_create_on_node();
>> wake_up_process(); //wakeup kthreadd
>
> TJ, I'm puzzled, why would we need to spawn new threads to update NUMA
> affinity when taking a CPU out? That doesn't make sense to me, we can
> either shrink the affinity of an existing thread or completely kill of a
> thread if the mask becomes empty. But why spawn a new thread?
>
>> flush_work();
>> wait_for_completion();
>>
>
> Yes, inverting cpuset and hotplug would break that chain, but I'm still
> wondering why workqueue needs to spawn threads on CPU down.
>
Thanks for the comments Peter
You rightly mentioned that a new thread will not be spawn
while updating NUMA affinity when taking a CPU out.
While a CPU is made offline, attempt is made to unbind per-cpu
worker for CPU going down. This is done by queuing unbind work
to system_highpri_wq. It results in an attempt to create one
bounded worker thread as there is none.
wait_for_completion() in flush_work() waits for unbinding to
finish for CPU going down.
Process A
cpu_subsys_offline();
cpu_down();
_cpu_down();
percpu_down_write(&cpu_hotplug_lock); //held
cpuhp_invoke_callback();
workqueue_offline_cpu();
queue_work_on(system_highpri_wq);
__queue_work();
insert_work();
wake_up_worker(); //pool->nr_running = 0
flush_work();
wait_for_completion();
worker_thread();
need_more_worker(); // returns true
manage_workers();
maybe_create_worker();
create_worker();
kthread_create_on_node();
wake_up_process(kthreadd_task);
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation
Center, Inc., is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation
Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-07 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-07 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> - 2017-09-08 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] cgroup/cpuset: remove circular dependency deadlock Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-09-07 20:00 +0200
csiph-web