Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1728435
| From | Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag |
| Date | 2017-09-07 23:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uncno-5CP-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <umuFH-AY-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umy6C-38F-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <umLZU-4KN-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <unc41-5dW-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 01:54:45PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Ross Zwisler > <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:12:35PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> On 9/5/17 5:35 PM, Ross Zwisler wrote: > >> > The original intent of this series was to add a per-inode DAX flag to ext4 > >> > so that it would be consistent with XFS. In my travels I found and fixed > >> > several related issues in both ext4 and XFS. > >> > >> Hi Ross - > >> > >> hch had a lot of reasons to nuke the dax flag from orbit, and we just > >> /disabled/ it in xfs due to its habit of crashing the kernel... > > > > Ah, sorry, I wasn't CC'd on those threads and missed them. For any interested > > bystanders: > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg57840.html > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg09831.html > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-xfs/msg10124.html > > > >> so a couple questions: > >> > >> 1) does this series pass hch's "test the per-inode DAX flag" fstest? > > > > Nope, it has the exact same problems as the XFS per-inode DAX flag. > > > >> 2) do we have an agreement that we need this flag at all, or is this > >> just a parity item because xfs has^whad a per-inode flag? > > > > It was for parity, and because it allows admins finer grained control over > > their system. Basically all things discussed in response to Lukas's original > > patch in the first link above. > > I think it's more than parity. When pmem is slower than page cache it > is actively harmful to have DAX enabled globally for a filesystem. So, > not only should we push for per-inode DAX control, we should also push > to deprecate the mount option. I agree with Christoph that we should > try to automatically and transparently enable DAX where it makes > sense, but we also need a finer-grained mechanism than a mount flag to > force the behavior one way or the other. Yep, agreed. I'll play with how to make this work after I've sorted out all the data corruptions I've found. :)
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 9/9] ext4: add per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 2/9] xfs: always use DAX if mount option is used Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 4/9] ext4: add ext4_should_use_dax() Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 8/9] ext4: add sanity check for encryption + DAX Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 5/9] ext4: ext4_change_inode_journal_flag error handling Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
[PATCH 7/9] ext4: prevent data corruption with inline data + DAX Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 7/9] ext4: prevent data corruption with inline data + DAX Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> - 2017-09-06 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 7/9] ext4: prevent data corruption with inline data + DAX Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-07 01:20 +0200
[PATCH 1/9] ext4: remove duplicate extended attributes defs Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/9] ext4: remove duplicate extended attributes defs Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-09-06 09:30 +0200
[PATCH 6/9] ext4: safely transition S_DAX on journaling changes Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 6/9] ext4: safely transition S_DAX on journaling changes Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-09-06 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 6/9] ext4: safely transition S_DAX on journaling changes Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Eric Sandeen <esandeen@redhat.com> - 2017-09-06 04:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> - 2017-09-07 23:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-07 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca> - 2017-09-07 23:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-08 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-08 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2017-09-08 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2017-09-08 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> - 2017-09-08 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 0/9] add ext4 per-inode DAX flag Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> - 2017-09-08 00:20 +0200
csiph-web