Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1728393
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] lkdtm: Add test for XPFO |
| Date | Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:10:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <unalA-4i2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <un8Wu-3e6-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <un8Wu-3e6-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=K85qvAk8gBZq9ek8TtvMlM4wN2hWtUJ9osXSI+o/eQk=; b=ZgAK+N+ths7r65TgdlSBxCMrjkCAdI9heFYs22H0EggaRBSWCISMlpM9N4F3sKwOCc PMd5HcbxPCfKj5c1LhfkPv0lk7FOax6VuiQjpic3mUntgeKIqjl8RUDGNp9xyGJVsaAl 6auiWDJArNNSMFZVhsHdom5RbWmZRlr678TS6UUK8JCDAYanjcp5UaRWrV3R2kevA8hC wamFv7WDYfFjcEUKdkPPpOxFzu568Z7TblLkaU8KqdULFNUuUjoI69RRtFaMuDtvRfHb RKSTCCD3/tgRJGWyvbXn7+0GD1B6DPaKu8yqI+yB9LpqQSiQBv2dhIeSvVJGH2smlHPG josw== |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=K85qvAk8gBZq9ek8TtvMlM4wN2hWtUJ9osXSI+o/eQk=; b=Miy7fp1i+9eu/P+yuZjrgHNXvCkDPq9BL+SKamw4XuoWjrZnJdIMmJ281zkYFWOy+e /oFItPeu2HOaFZfmdHYtdZjc42ARbgxa2t38rNHher0UjCzS2/v0vQNFVjSGyKw4LQuU EB99iscPEPBC179i8G3rGLT8ebpH+BBMwD9OM= |
| X-Google-Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K85qvAk8gBZq9ek8TtvMlM4wN2hWtUJ9osXSI+o/eQk=; b=OZK553E6fmyfLSUlODLmbX/qDmeHCnyyjclUBsrobbRm6wLOUE0AiAdSPYSz8qDgJN s+vzSfni3yfI5e0o2u3ZVeOgocwIK7VjMiwNkHHWIcOmmn72pBNO8s5bnwURa97r9c+m YAOspfN2OyKbPvcqPVZigiVd4/6aR1NDrSIpkJ5Hkv6htvO54yd6kRZSqrgHuOpSRBWg aUC00oQhb5wP+irnFg7h0R4CMPotbXZY7QLyCg/ybRpQjjzMJHLGX8/pGksDQixrMSeK pmMFW0j2qGOqA8QxlFMfh42ZvQdOMI5St2PEFyjNyLh+4ctWcT7GUKuVN4uvgpvQoFDU 7o9g== |
| X-Gm-Message-State | AHPjjUj1xlhN/NYHwzN5S1zOCJ/r30GZDZTvbCJ/vY8FmDVjhXQXRgvk 8w0JVXI2BsNE+lybPeCHsHD2fM2VZMaKOxZi0VgqMQ== |
| X-Google-SMTP-Source | AOwi7QB6Ym5vF8K0j9bZjd5RqxMDOWxdOchXiqQ1hVMivd2I9N16/z8stHVVfZxXlg287iw2+mliIk3ESuxTM1ZfyXA= |
| X-Received | by 10.107.10.77 with SMTP id u74mr326009ioi.243.1504811295718; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 12:08:15 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | 9Wnd7Suuj136yHsp3lpmbdEcgEI |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| List-ID | <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org> |
| X-Mailing-List | linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 291 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| X-Original-Cc | LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>, Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@gmail.com>, Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com> |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:08:14 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <CAGXu5jJSp+8_AgGiG8f8ZaJvCzyk-jTumTAxcVc9yRm_z0OWCw@mail.gmail.com> |
| X-Original-References | <20170907173609.22696-1-tycho@docker.com> <20170907173609.22696-12-tycho@docker.com> |
| X-Original-Sender | linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.kernel:1728393 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> wrote:
> From: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>
>
> This test simply reads from userspace memory via the kernel's linear
> map.
>
> v6: * drop an #ifdef, just let the test fail if XPFO is not supported
> * add XPFO_SMP test to try and test the case when one CPU does an xpfo
> unmap of an address, that it can't be used accidentally by other
> CPUs.
This is very close! Thanks for the updates. :) Notes below...
>
> Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
> Tested-by: Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 5 ++
> drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 3 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> index b0b766416306..8447b42a447d 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_heap.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_perms.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_usercopy.o
> +lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_xpfo.o
>
> KCOV_INSTRUMENT_lkdtm_rodata.o := n
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> index 3b4976396ec4..34a6ee37f216 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> @@ -64,4 +64,9 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
> void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
> void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
>
> +/* lkdtm_xpfo.c */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER(void);
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE(void);
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_SMP(void);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> index 42d2b8e31e6b..9544e329de4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_READ_USER),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_SMP),
> };
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d903063bdd0b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
> +/*
> + * This is for all the tests related to XPFO (eXclusive Page Frame Ownership).
> + */
> +
> +#include "lkdtm.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/xpfo.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task.h>
> +
> +#define XPFO_DATA 0xdeadbeef
> +
> +static unsigned long do_map(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, user_data = XPFO_DATA;
> +
> + user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> + flags, 0);
> + if (user_addr >= TASK_SIZE) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to allocate user memory\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, &user_data,
> + sizeof(user_data))) {
> + pr_warn("copy_to_user failed\n");
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + return user_addr;
> +
> +free_user:
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long *user_to_kernel(unsigned long user_addr)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> + void *virt_addr;
> +
> + phys_addr = user_virt_to_phys(user_addr);
> + if (!phys_addr) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to get physical address of user memory\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + virt_addr = phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
> + if (phys_addr != virt_to_phys(virt_addr)) {
> + pr_warn("Physical address of user memory seems incorrect\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return virt_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static void read_map(unsigned long *virt_addr)
> +{
> + pr_info("Attempting bad read from kernel address %p\n", virt_addr);
> + if (*(unsigned long *)virt_addr == XPFO_DATA)
> + pr_err("FAIL: Bad read succeeded?!\n");
> + else
> + pr_err("FAIL: Bad read didn't fail but data is incorrect?!\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void read_user_with_flags(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, *kernel;
> +
> + user_addr = do_map(flags);
> + if (!user_addr) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: map failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kernel = user_to_kernel(user_addr);
> + if (!kernel) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: user to kernel conversion failed\n");
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + read_map(kernel);
> +
> +free_user:
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +/* Read from userspace via the kernel's linear map. */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER(void)
> +{
> + read_user_with_flags(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS);
> +}
> +
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE(void)
> +{
> + read_user_with_flags(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB);
> +}
> +
> +struct smp_arg {
> + unsigned long *virt_addr;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +};
> +
> +static int smp_reader(void *parg)
> +{
> + struct smp_arg *arg = parg;
> + unsigned long *virt_addr;
> +
> + if (arg->cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: scheduled on wrong CPU?\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + virt_addr = smp_cond_load_acquire(&arg->virt_addr, VAL != NULL);
> + read_map(virt_addr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGKILL
> +#elif CONFIG_ARM64
> +#define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGSEGV
> +#else
> +#error unsupported arch
> +#endif
This will fail the build for other architectures, so I would just do
this as an single if/else:
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
# define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGSEGV
#else
# define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGKILL
#endif
> +
> +/* The idea here is to read from the kernel's map on a different thread than
Comment style nit: leading /*\n please...
> + * did the mapping (and thus the TLB flushing), to make sure that the page
> + * faults on other cores too.
> + */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_SMP(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, *virt_addr;
> + struct task_struct *thread;
> + int ret;
> + struct smp_arg arg;
> +
> + if (num_online_cpus() < 2) {
> + pr_err("not enough to do a multi cpu test\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + arg.virt_addr = NULL;
> + arg.cpu = (smp_processor_id() + 1) % num_online_cpus();
> + thread = kthread_create(smp_reader, &arg, "lkdtm_xpfo_test");
> + if (IS_ERR(thread)) {
> + pr_err("couldn't create kthread? %ld\n", PTR_ERR(thread));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kthread_bind(thread, arg.cpu);
> + get_task_struct(thread);
> + wake_up_process(thread);
> +
> + user_addr = do_map(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS);
> + if (!user_addr)
> + goto kill_thread;
> +
> + virt_addr = user_to_kernel(user_addr);
> + if (!virt_addr) {
> + /*
> + * let's store something that will fail, so we can unblock the
> + * thread
> + */
> + smp_store_release(&arg.virt_addr, &arg);
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + smp_store_release(&arg.virt_addr, virt_addr);
> +
> + /* there must be a better way to do this. */
> + while (1) {
> + if (thread->exit_state)
> + break;
> + msleep_interruptible(100);
> + }
I don't like infinite loops. How about giving this a 1 second max runtime?
> +
> +free_user:
> + if (user_addr)
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +kill_thread:
> + ret = kthread_stop(thread);
> + if (ret != XPFO_SMP_KILLED)
> + pr_err("FAIL: thread wasn't killed: %d\n", ret);
> + put_task_struct(thread);
> +}
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Otherwise it looks great, thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 11/11] lkdtm: Add test for XPFO Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> - 2017-09-07 19:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] lkdtm: Add test for XPFO Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-09-07 21:10 +0200
csiph-web