Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1727141
| From | zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array |
| Date | 2017-09-06 06:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umzFn-433-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
type bool is used to index three arrays in alloc_and_link_pwqs()
it doesn't look like conventional.
it is fixed by using type int to index the relevant arrays.
Signed-off-by: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@htc.com>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index ab3c0dc8c7ed..0c7a16792949 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3917,7 +3917,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
- bool highpri = wq->flags & WQ_HIGHPRI;
+ int pool_idx = (wq->flags & WQ_HIGHPRI) ? 1 : 0;
int cpu, ret;
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
@@ -3931,7 +3931,7 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
- init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+ init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[pool_idx]);
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
link_pwq(pwq);
@@ -3939,14 +3939,15 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
}
return 0;
} else if (wq->flags & __WQ_ORDERED) {
- ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, ordered_wq_attrs[highpri]);
+ ret = apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, ordered_wq_attrs[pool_idx]);
/* there should only be single pwq for ordering guarantee */
WARN(!ret && (wq->pwqs.next != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node ||
wq->pwqs.prev != &wq->dfl_pwq->pwqs_node),
"ordering guarantee broken for workqueue %s\n", wq->name);
return ret;
} else {
- return apply_workqueue_attrs(wq, unbound_std_wq_attrs[highpri]);
+ return apply_workqueue_attrs(wq,
+ unbound_std_wq_attrs[pool_idx]);
}
}
--
1.9.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2017-09-06 06:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-06 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2017-09-06 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-06 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com> - 2017-09-06 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: use type int instead of bool to index array Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-09-06 19:30 +0200
csiph-web