Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1726716
| From | Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: execve(NULL, argv, envp) for nommu? |
| Date | 2017-09-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umm5r-38R-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <umi1P-Ly-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <umi1P-Ly-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | Intel Corporation |
> > anymore. But I'm already _running_ this program. If I could fork() I > > could already get a second copy of the sucker and call main() again > > myself if necessary, but I can't, so... You can - ptrace 8) > > honoring the suid bit if people feel that way. I just wanna unblock > > vfork() while still running this code. Would it make more sense to have a way to promote your vfork into a fork when you hit these cases (I appreciate that fork on NOMMU has a much higher performance cost as you start having to softmmu copy or swap pages). Alan
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: execve(NULL, argv, envp) for nommu? Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> - 2017-09-05 11:10 +0200
Re: execve(NULL, argv, envp) for nommu? Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> - 2017-09-05 15:30 +0200
Re: execve(NULL, argv, envp) for nommu? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-09-06 03:20 +0200
Re: execve(NULL, argv, envp) for nommu? Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> - 2017-09-08 23:20 +0200
csiph-web