Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1726318

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] apei: add ghes param for arch_apei_report_mem_error

From Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] apei: add ghes param for arch_apei_report_mem_error
Date 2017-09-05 04:30 +0200
Message-ID <umbMJ-5d5-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ukRwJ-2IO-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukRwL-2IO-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukS9s-3q0-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi Borislav,

On 2017/9/1 19:15, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> n Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 06:32:00PM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> Add ghes param for arch_apei_report_mem_error, with which
>> we could do more arch-specific processing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c   | 2 +-
>>  drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c | 4 +++-
>>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c      | 2 +-
>>  include/acpi/apei.h           | 4 +++-
>>  include/acpi/ghes.h           | 3 ++-
>>  5 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>> index ea3046e..1bf1c9b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c
>> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ int arch_apei_enable_cmcff(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
>> -void arch_apei_report_mem_error(int sev, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
>> +void arch_apei_report_mem_error(struct ghes *ghes, int sev, struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
>>  {
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_MCE
>>  	apei_mce_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
>> index da370e1..317169b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/apei-base.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
>>  #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>>  
>> +#include <acpi/ghes.h>
>> +
>>  #include "apei-internal.h"
>>  
>>  #define APEI_PFX "APEI: "
>> @@ -770,7 +772,7 @@ int __weak arch_apei_enable_cmcff(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr,
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(arch_apei_enable_cmcff);
>>  
>> -void __weak arch_apei_report_mem_error(int sev,
>> +void __weak arch_apei_report_mem_error(struct ghes *ghes, int sev,
>>  				       struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err)
>>  {
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> index fa9400d..996d16c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
>> @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
>>  
>>  			ghes_edac_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
>>  
>> -			arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
>> +			arch_apei_report_mem_error(ghes, sev, mem_err);
> 
> And next time you want to pass something else, you'll have to touch all
> those files again...
> 
> Instead, make that a notifier to which consumers register and define
> a separate struct mem_err or ghes_err or whatnot and populate it with
> cper_sec_mem_err data and whatever else is needed by the consumers.
> Instead of passing that struct ghes * which consumers don't need to
> know.

OK, I'll add a notify chain here, thanks.

> 
> Thx.
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[RFC PATCH v1 0/3] arm64/ras: support sea error recovery Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> - 2017-09-01 12:40 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] apei: add ghes param for arch_apei_report_mem_error Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> - 2017-09-01 12:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] apei: add ghes param for  arch_apei_report_mem_error Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-09-01 13:20 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 2/3] apei: add ghes param for  arch_apei_report_mem_error Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> - 2017-09-05 04:30 +0200
  [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] arm64/ras: support sea error recovery Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> - 2017-09-01 12:40 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] arm64/ras: support sea error recovery Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> - 2017-09-01 13:20 +0200
    Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] arm64/ras: support sea error recovery Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com> - 2017-09-01 18:00 +0200
      Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] arm64/ras: support sea error recovery Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com> - 2017-09-04 05:10 +0200

csiph-web