Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1727863

RE: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance max buffer

From "Liu, Baohong" <baohong.liu@intel.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject RE: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance max buffer
Date 2017-09-07 03:20 +0200
Message-ID <umTE6-1fa-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <umu2Z-5m-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <umu2Z-5m-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <umTb3-NZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 20:49:46 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:57:19 -0500
> Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@intel.com>
> >
> > Currently absolute timestamps are applied to both regular and max
> > buffers only for global trace. For instance trace, absolute timestamps
> > are applied only to regular buffer. But, regular and max buffers can
> > be swapped, for example, following a snapshot. So, for instance trace,
> > bad timestamps can be seen following a snapshot.
> > Let's apply absolute timestamps to instance max buffer as well.
> >
> > Similarly, buffer clock change is applied to instance max buffer as
> > well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c index
> > 66d465e..719e4c1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> > @@ -6223,7 +6223,7 @@ static int tracing_set_clock(struct trace_array *tr,
> const char *clockstr)
> >  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> > -	if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL && tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> > +	if (tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> >  		ring_buffer_set_clock(tr->max_buffer.buffer,
> trace_clocks[i].func);
> >  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->max_buffer);
> >  #endif
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > @@ -6307,7 +6307,7 @@ int tracing_set_time_stamp_abs(struct trace_array
> *tr, bool abs)
> >  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> > -	if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL && tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> > +	if (tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> >  		ring_buffer_set_time_stamp_abs(tr->max_buffer.buffer, abs);
> >  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->max_buffer);
> >  #endif
> 
> Please fold this part into the previous patch. I'm adding the first part to my tree
> now and will start testing it tonight, and push it to Linus by the weekend.

Will do.

Thanks,

Baohong

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in the
> body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance max buffer Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com> - 2017-09-06 00:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance  max buffer Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-09-06 22:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance  max buffer Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-09-07 02:50 +0200
    RE: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance  max buffer "Liu, Baohong" <baohong.liu@intel.com> - 2017-09-07 03:20 +0200

csiph-web