Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1727502
| From | Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: SME/32-bit regression |
| Date | 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umJ22-2yd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <umzvH-3X8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <umEOK-85j-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <umJ22-2yd-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:26 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:45:07PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > >> It appears there is a regression for 32-bit kernels due to SME changes. > >> > >> I bisected my particular problem > > It being? Doesn't boot, splats? > > Xen guest crashes very early, before a splat can can be generated. > > > > >> (Xen PV guest) to > >> 21729f81ce8ae76a6995681d40e16f7ce8075db4 but I also saw pmd_clear_bad() > >> errors on baremetal. This seems to be caused by sme_me_mask being an > >> unsigned long as opposed to phys_addr_t (the actual problem is that > >> __PHYSICAL_MASK is truncated). When I declare it as u64 and drop unsigned > >> long cast in __sme_set()/__sme_clr() the problem goes way. (This presumably > >> won't work for non-PAE which I haven't tried). > > Right, so I think we should do this because those macros should not have > > any effect on !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT setups. > > This won't help though if kernel is built with SME support. Which is not the case for 32bit. SME depends on 64bit
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 05:50 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 11:30 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 11:50 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 18:50 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 20:30 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 23:10 +0200
[PATCH] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-07 11:40 +0200
[tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64 tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-09-07 12:40 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 16:10 +0200
Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200
csiph-web