Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1727502

Re: SME/32-bit regression

From Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: SME/32-bit regression
Date 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200
Message-ID <umJ22-2yd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <umzvH-3X8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <umEOK-85j-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <umJ22-2yd-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 09/06/2017 05:26 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:45:07PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> >> It appears there is a regression for 32-bit kernels due to SME changes.
> >>
> >> I bisected my particular problem
> > It being? Doesn't boot, splats?
> 
> Xen guest crashes very early, before a splat can can be generated.
> 
> >
> >> (Xen PV guest) to
> >> 21729f81ce8ae76a6995681d40e16f7ce8075db4 but I also saw pmd_clear_bad()
> >> errors on baremetal. This seems to be caused by sme_me_mask being an
> >> unsigned long as opposed to phys_addr_t (the actual problem is that
> >> __PHYSICAL_MASK is truncated). When I declare it as u64 and drop unsigned
> >> long cast in __sme_set()/__sme_clr() the problem goes way. (This presumably
> >> won't work for non-PAE which I haven't tried).
> > Right, so I think we should do this because those macros should not have
> > any effect on !CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT setups.
> 
> This won't help though if kernel is built with SME support.

Which is not the case for 32bit. SME depends on 64bit

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 05:50 +0200
  Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 11:30 +0200
    Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 11:50 +0200
      Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 18:50 +0200
        Re: SME/32-bit regression Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-06 20:30 +0200
          Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 23:10 +0200
            [PATCH] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64 Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2017-09-07 11:40 +0200
              [tip:x86/urgent] x86/mm: Make the SME mask a u64 tip-bot for Borislav Petkov <tipbot@zytor.com> - 2017-09-07 12:40 +0200
    Re: SME/32-bit regression Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200
      Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 16:10 +0200
    Re: SME/32-bit regression Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> - 2017-09-06 16:00 +0200

csiph-web