Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1727388
| From | gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits |
| Date | 2017-09-06 14:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <umHtf-1Ck-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <umDJ0-7kw-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <umEYp-89a-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <umF85-8in-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <umFUv-oN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <umHjA-1yw-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2017/9/6 20:00, Vladimir Murzin wrote: > On 06/09/17 11:35, gengdongjiu wrote: >> Vladimir, >> >> On 2017/9/6 17:41, Vladimir Murzin wrote: >>> Can you please elaborate on cases where PAN is not enabled? >> >> I mean the informal private usage, For example, he disabled the PAN dynamically to let kernel space to access the user space. >> After he dynamic disabled the PAN, then switched to guest OS. after return to host. he found the PAN stage is modified. >> Of cause this is not a formal usage, in our host kernel, it is always enabled, no dynamic change, but I means it may exist such cases. >> >> > > So, in short, there is no real issue with PAN, right? What about UAO? For the PAN, if host OS dynamically enable/disable PAN should have issue. Do you think that is not a issue as above description? "host OS dynamically disable the PAN, but after go back from the guest OS, The PAN is unexpectedly enabled" > > Cheers > Vladimir > > . >
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-05 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 07:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-09-06 10:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2017-09-06 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 12:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2017-09-06 14:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 14:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2017-09-06 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 14:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com> - 2017-09-06 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: VHE: save and restore some PSTATE bits gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com> - 2017-09-06 12:00 +0200
csiph-web