Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1723512
| From | "Mohandass, Divagar" <divagar.mohandass@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support |
| Date | 2017-08-30 19:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ukeF5-2E4-29@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uk2DT-3wQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uk2DT-3wQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uk64O-5w3-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukarL-8kx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ukaBs-8nI-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Sakari, Thanks for the review. My comments below. --- ^Divagar >-----Original Message----- >From: Sakari Ailus [mailto:sakari.ailus@iki.fi] >Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 6:11 PM >To: Mohandass, Divagar <divagar.mohandass@intel.com> >Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org; mark.rutland@arm.com; wsa@the-dreams.de; >devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org; linux- >kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mani, Rajmohan <rajmohan.mani@intel.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support > >On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 12:32:07PM +0000, Mohandass, Divagar wrote: >> >> @@ -743,6 +770,15 @@ static int at24_probe(struct i2c_client >> >> *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id) >> >> >> >> i2c_set_clientdata(client, at24); >> >> >> >> + /* enable runtime pm */ >> >> + pm_runtime_get_noresume(&client->dev); >> >> + err = pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev); >> >> + if (err < 0) >> >> + goto err_clients; >> >> + >> >> + pm_runtime_enable(&client->dev); >> >> + pm_runtime_put(&client->dev); >> >> + >> > >> >You're just about to perform a read here. I believe you should move >> >the last put after that. >> >> At the end of at24_read we are performing a pm_runtime_put, still we need >this change ? > >True, so this isn't an actual problem. > >It'll still power the chip down when you're about to need it, so it'd make sense >to perform the check before pm_runtime_put(). > >I might move the runtime PM setup after the check altogether. Ok, I will move the pm_runtime_put() after the check and publish the v4. Moving the PM setup altogether below, will introduce more error handling in read call. > >-- >Sakari Ailus >e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support Divagar Mohandass <divagar.mohandass@intel.com> - 2017-08-30 06:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> - 2017-08-30 10:00 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support "Mohandass, Divagar" <divagar.mohandass@intel.com> - 2017-08-30 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@iki.fi> - 2017-08-30 14:50 +0200
RE: [PATCH v3 3/3] eeprom: at24: enable runtime pm support "Mohandass, Divagar" <divagar.mohandass@intel.com> - 2017-08-30 19:10 +0200
csiph-web