Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1723059
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks |
| Date | 2017-08-30 08:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uk4FH-4NR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uiits-1L5-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <uin06-4CU-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <uip1T-5RV-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujTTY-6ib-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <uk0sp-1Us-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:53:39AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 08:57:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 12:49:26AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > However, how would it distinguish things like flushing another work > > > > > > I think it must be distinguished with what it actually waits for, e.i. > > > completion > > > variables instead of work or wq. I will make it next week and let you know. > > > > So no. The existing annotations are strictly better than relying on > > cross-release. > > Thank you for exaplanation but, as I already said, this is why I said > "I don't think it's the same level currently. But, I can make it with > some modification." to TJ: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1479560.html > > And also I mentioned we might need the current code inevitably but, the > existing annotations are never good and why here: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1480173.html I can read the words, but have no idea what you're trying to say.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-08-25 15:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 17:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-29 21:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-30 04:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-30 08:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] workqueue: remove manual lockdep uses to detect deadlocks Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-29 02:30 +0200
csiph-web