Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1720915
| From | Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings |
| Date | 2017-08-27 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ujbJg-3FY-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uggm5-4B1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uggm5-4B1-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ujb6y-3q9-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 22:00 +0300, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 08/19/2017 09:06 PM, sean.wang@mediatek.com wrote: > > From: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > > > Document the devicetree bindings in 8250.txt for MediaTek BTIF > > controller which could be found on MT7622 and MT7623 SoC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > > index 419ff6c..7528d90 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/8250.txt > > @@ -14,6 +14,9 @@ Required properties: > > tegra132, or tegra210. > > - "nxp,lpc3220-uart" > > - "ralink,rt2880-uart" > > + - For MediaTek MT7623, must contain "mediatek,mt7623-btif" > > + - For other MediaTek SoCs , must contain "mediatek,<chip>-btif", > > + "mediatek,mt7623-btif" where <chip> is mt7622. > > Hm, to me that's confusing. What about: > "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7623 > "mediatek,mt7622-btif", "mediatek,mt7623-btif": for MediaTek MT7622 > > If in the future we have more SoCs that support the BTIF, we should add them > like the mt7622 case. > I had v3, but it should have similar logic and also got ack from Rob I knew all your logic of adding binding document for all MediaTek devices, even I alway added MediaTek device in dt-bindings as the way you mentioned here, but I felt this way is fine for this kind of dedicated document. The reason i don't add it as usual is the following. 8250.txt is common and shared among all uart like devices, so i don't want btif device occupies too much section and bloat the document when every new MediaTek SoC is introduced. So instead I refer to existing Nvidia device added in 8250.txt which I thought its way is simple, elegant and also using pattern I can use to add btif devices. Sean > Make sense? > > Regards, > Matthias
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2017-08-27 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com> - 2017-08-27 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 1/2] dt-bindings: serial: 8250: Add MediaTek BTIF controller bindings Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com> - 2017-08-28 07:30 +0200
csiph-web