Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1719832

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree

From Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree
Date 2017-08-25 10:50 +0200
Message-ID <uiitr-1L5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <uieSS-7VN-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <uii0q-1zX-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25 2017 at  2:57:21 pm BST, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-arm tree got a conflict in:
>>
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
>>
>> between commit:
>>
>>   1f9b8936f36f ("arm64: Decode information from ESR upon mem faults")
>>
>> from the arm64 tree and commit:
>>
>>   c5511c3c068c ("KVM: arm/arm64: Fix guest external abort matching")
>>
>> from the kvm-arm tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (I used the former version) and can carry the fix as
>> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
>> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
>> when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
>> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
>> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> Thanks for that, result looking good.
>
> Christoffer: I think we could simply drop the hunk touching esr.h from
> James' patch. After all, even if nothing is using it, this bit still
> exists in the ESR register, and there is little gain in dropping its
> definition. This would solve the conflict nicely...
>

Yes, I have updated the branch accordingly and added my signed-off-by as well.

Thanks,
-Christoffer

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2017-08-25 07:00 +0200
  Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-08-25 10:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kvm-arm tree with the arm64 tree Christoffer Dall <cdall@cs.columbia.edu> - 2017-08-25 10:50 +0200

csiph-web