Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1719647
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT |
| Date | 2017-08-25 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui9Tb-4MH-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uhDTk-14P-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <ui6iB-2kS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 9:47:52 PM CEST Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > > The new 'select CPUFREQ_DT' statement causes a warning in some > > configurations: > > > > warning: (ARCH_U8500) selects CPUFREQ_DT which has unmet direct dependencies (CPU_FREQ && HAVE_CLK && OF && (!CPU_THERMAL || THERMAL)) > > > > No other platform does this, so I think for consistency it's > > best if we remove it again from ux500 and instead add the driver > > to the defconfig. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > OK then. I should update the defconfig anyway. > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > Rafael, can you stick this on top of the other patches on > your cpufreq branch? Done locally, but will show up in linux-next next week. Though honestly, that not being in linux-pm Patchwork doesn't make things particularly easy for me ... Thanks, Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2017-08-23 15:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2017-08-24 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: don't select CPUFREQ_DT "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-08-25 01:40 +0200
csiph-web