Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1719617
| From | "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [RFC v1] sched/fair: search a task from the tail of the queue |
| Date | 2017-08-25 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ui8DL-46q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
As a first step this patch makes cfs_tasks list as MRU one.
It means, that when a next task is picked to run on physical
CPU it is moved to the front of the list.
Thefore, the cfs_tasks list is more or less sorted (except woken
tasks) starting from recently given CPU time tasks toward tasks
with max wait time in a run-queue, i.e. MRU list.
Second, as part of the load balance operation, this approach
starts detach_tasks()/detach_one_task() from the tail of the
queue instead of the head, giving some advantages:
- tends to pick a task with highest wait time;
- tasks located in the tail are less likely cache-hot,
therefore the can_migrate_task() decision is higher.
hackbench illustrates slightly better performance. For example
doing 1000 samples and 40 groups on i5-3320M CPU, it shows below
figures:
default: 0.644 avg
patched: 0.637 avg
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c77e4b1d51c0..cda281c6bb29 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6357,7 +6357,7 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
- return p;
+ goto done;
simple:
cfs_rq = &rq->cfs;
#endif
@@ -6378,6 +6378,14 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
if (hrtick_enabled(rq))
hrtick_start_fair(rq, p);
+done: __maybe_unused
+ /*
+ * Move the next running task to the front of
+ * the list, so our cfs_tasks list becomes MRU
+ * one.
+ */
+ list_move(&se->group_node, &rq->cfs_tasks);
+
return p;
idle:
@@ -6806,11 +6814,12 @@ static void detach_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
*/
static struct task_struct *detach_one_task(struct lb_env *env)
{
- struct task_struct *p, *n;
+ struct task_struct *p;
lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) {
+ list_for_each_entry_reverse(p,
+ &env->src_rq->cfs_tasks, se.group_node) {
if (!can_migrate_task(p, env))
continue;
@@ -6856,7 +6865,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
if (env->idle != CPU_NOT_IDLE && env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1)
break;
- p = list_first_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
+ p = list_last_entry(tasks, struct task_struct, se.group_node);
env->loop++;
/* We've more or less seen every task there is, call it quits */
@@ -6906,7 +6915,7 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
continue;
next:
- list_move_tail(&p->se.group_node, tasks);
+ list_move(&p->se.group_node, tasks);
}
/*
--
2.11.0
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC v1] sched/fair: search a task from the tail of the queue "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com> - 2017-08-25 00:20 +0200
Re: [RFC v1] sched/fair: search a task from the tail of the queue Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-28 10:50 +0200
Re: [RFC v1] sched/fair: search a task from the tail of the queue Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com> - 2017-08-30 08:10 +0200
csiph-web