Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1716568

Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND

From Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND
Date 2017-08-21 16:50 +0200
Message-ID <ugWbF-5BL-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <ugVpg-54m-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <ugVpg-54m-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 03:49:51PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> cpumask is the list of CPUs present when the queue is built.
> If a new CPU is hotplugged, this list is not updated,
> and when the scheduler asks for a CPU id, blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> can return WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.
> And in this case _blk_mq_run_hw_queue() can be executed by the new CPU
> (that is not present in cpumask) and raises the following warning:
> 
>     WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(raw_smp_processor_id(), hctx->cpumask) &&
>             cpu_online(hctx->next_cpu));
> 
> To fix this problem, this patch modifies blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu()
> to only return a CPU id present in cpumask.

So, this one isn't needed either.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> - 2017-08-21 16:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] blk-mq: don't use WORK_CPU_UNBOUND Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2017-08-21 16:50 +0200

csiph-web