Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1715562

[PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements

From Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements
Date 2017-08-19 06:40 +0200
Message-ID <ug3Ie-54O-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Document the membarrier requirement on having a full memory barrier in
__schedule() after coming from user-space, before storing to rq->curr.
It is provided by smp_mb__before_spinlock() in __schedule().

Document that membarrier requires a full barrier on transition from
kernel thread to userspace thread, which skips the call to switch_mm(). We
currently have an implicit barrier from atomic_dec_and_test() in mmdrop() that
ensures this.

The x86 switch_mm_irqs_off() full barrier is currently provided by many cpumask
update operations as well as load_cr3(). Document that load_cr3() is providing
this barrier.

[ Rebased on top of linux-rcu for-mingo branch.
  Applies on top of "membarrier: Provide expedited private command". ]

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@gmail.com>
CC: gromer@google.com
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c        | 3 +++
 include/linux/sched/mm.h | 4 ++++
 kernel/sched/core.c      | 9 +++++++++
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 014d07a..cd815b6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -133,6 +133,9 @@ void switch_mm_irqs_off(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
 	 * and neither LOCK nor MFENCE orders them.
 	 * Fortunately, load_cr3() is serializing and gives the
 	 * ordering guarantee we need.
+	 *
+	 * This full barrier is also required by the membarrier
+	 * system call.
 	 */
 	load_cr3(next->pgd);
 
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 2b24a69..fe29d06 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static inline void mmgrab(struct mm_struct *mm)
 extern void __mmdrop(struct mm_struct *);
 static inline void mmdrop(struct mm_struct *mm)
 {
+	/*
+	 * The implicit full barrier implied by atomic_dec_and_test is
+	 * required by the membarrier system call.
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->mm_count)))
 		__mmdrop(mm);
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 3f29c6a..b0f199f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2654,6 +2654,12 @@ static struct rq *finish_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
 	finish_arch_post_lock_switch();
 
 	fire_sched_in_preempt_notifiers(current);
+	/*
+	 * When transitioning from a kernel thread to a userspace
+	 * thread, mmdrop()'s implicit full barrier is required by the
+	 * membarrier system call, because the current active_mm can
+	 * become the current mm without going through switch_mm().
+	 */
 	if (mm)
 		mmdrop(mm);
 	if (unlikely(prev_state == TASK_DEAD)) {
@@ -3295,6 +3301,9 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
 	 * Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
 	 * can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
 	 * done by the caller to avoid the race with signal_wake_up().
+	 *
+	 * The membarrier system call requires a full memory barrier
+	 * after coming from user-space, before storing to rq->curr.
 	 */
 	smp_mb__before_spinlock();
 	rq_lock(rq, &rf);
-- 
1.9.1

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-08-19 06:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-20 07:10 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-21 10:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-22 08:30 +0200

csiph-web