Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1714684
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() |
| Date | 2017-08-18 10:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ufKPg-VO-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ufKPf-VO-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
It would be better to try to check other siblings first if
SD_PREFER_SIBLING is flaged when pushing tasks - migration.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 0223694..115250b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1319,12 +1319,35 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_earliest_pushable_dl_task(struct rq *rq, int cpu
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask_dl);
+/*
+ * Find the first cpu in: mask & sd & ~prefer
+ */
+static int find_cpu(const struct cpumask *mask,
+ const struct sched_domain *sd,
+ const struct sched_domain *prefer)
+{
+ const struct cpumask *sds = sched_domain_span(sd);
+ const struct cpumask *ps = prefer ? sched_domain_span(prefer) : NULL;
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sds))
+ continue;
+ if (ps && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, ps))
+ continue;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ return cpu;
+}
+
static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
{
- struct sched_domain *sd;
+ struct sched_domain *sd, *prefer = NULL;
struct cpumask *later_mask = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl);
int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
int cpu = task_cpu(task);
+ int fallback_cpu = -1;
/* Make sure the mask is initialized first */
if (unlikely(!later_mask))
@@ -1376,8 +1399,7 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
return this_cpu;
}
- best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(later_mask,
- sched_domain_span(sd));
+ best_cpu = find_cpu(later_mask, sd, prefer);
/*
* Last chance: if a cpu being in both later_mask
* and current sd span is valid, that becomes our
@@ -1385,6 +1407,26 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
* already under consideration through later_mask.
*/
if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
+ /*
+ * If current domain is SD_PREFER_SIBLING
+ * flaged, we have to try to check other
+ * siblings first.
+ */
+ if (sd->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING) {
+ prefer = sd;
+
+ /*
+ * fallback_cpu should be one
+ * in the closest domain among
+ * SD_PREFER_SIBLING domains,
+ * in case that more than one
+ * SD_PREFER_SIBLING domains
+ * exist in the hierachy.
+ */
+ if (fallback_cpu == -1)
+ fallback_cpu = best_cpu;
+ continue;
+ }
rcu_read_unlock();
return best_cpu;
}
@@ -1393,6 +1435,13 @@ static int find_later_rq(struct task_struct *task)
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
+ * If fallback_cpu is valid, all our guesses failed *except* for
+ * SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain. Now, we can return the fallback cpu.
+ */
+ if (fallback_cpu != -1)
+ return fallback_cpu;
+
+ /*
* At this point, all our guesses failed, we just return
* 'something', and let the caller sort the things out.
*/
--
1.9.1
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v8 0/2] Make find_later_rq() choose a closer cpu in topology Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-18 10:30 +0200
[PATCH v8 2/2] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-18 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] sched/rt: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_lowest_rq() Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-08-18 15:40 +0200
[PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-18 10:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-08-21 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-21 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-08-21 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-22 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-22 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2017-08-22 09:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] sched/deadline: Add support for SD_PREFER_SIBLING on find_later_rq() Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> - 2017-08-22 09:50 +0200
csiph-web