Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1711335
| From | Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz |
| Date | 2017-08-14 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uesrn-7E5-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <udnDs-7se-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <udFqG-1Rz-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <ue2Qh-mC-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uer2h-6Tj-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uervj-72Y-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 13:34 -0400, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 19:01:09 +0200 > > > What is the source of the load balancing inducing such latency when a single > > task is affine to a CPU? If this is idle load balancing, it is now affine to > > housekeepers. If this is task wakeup then it's suprising because select_task_rq() > > is optimized toward single CPU affinity. > > I guess it was idle load balancing, but I don't remember because this > was a few years ago. I think this might be reproducible without using > isolcpus=. I'll give it a try shortly and let you know. idle_balance() can swamp other noise by a couple orders of magnitude, -Mike
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-08-12 16:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> - 2017-08-13 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-08-14 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com> - 2017-08-14 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-14 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> - 2017-08-15 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-15 17:20 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-15 17:40 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-08-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-15 18:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-08-16 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-16 20:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH 7/9] housekeeping: Use own boot option, independant from nohz Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-15 18:00 +0200
csiph-web