Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irq/irq_sim: add a simple interrupt simulator framework

From	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk>
Newsgroups	linux.kernel
Subject	Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irq/irq_sim: add a simple interrupt simulator framework
Date	2017-08-14 12:10 +0200
Message-ID	<uektP-2Py-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<u9GOm-5h7-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9GOm-5h7-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <udD5v-bo-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <uekka-2xb-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 14 August 2017 17:54:22 GMT+08:00, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>2017-08-12 13:43 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>:
>> On Tue,  1 Aug 2017 16:50:26 +0200
>> Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> Implement a simple, irq_work-based framework for simulating
>>> interrupts. Currently the API exposes routines for initializing and
>>> deinitializing the simulator object, enqueueing the interrupts and
>>> retrieving the allocated interrupt numbers based on the offset of
>the
>>> dummy interrupt in the simulator struct.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
>>
>> Only tiny thing is the lack of a specified license for the code...
>
>I'll send a v3 with license added.
>
>> + checkpatch is warning about wrong file mode...
>> #105:
>> new file mode 100644
>>
>> Though I have no idea why...
>>
>
>I think this only says that a file was created with given mode, it's
>not a warning. The actual warning is about missing a new entry in
>MAINTAINERS.
Doh, how did I miss that!


>
>>> --- a/init/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/init/Kconfig
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ config CONSTRUCTORS
>>>  config IRQ_WORK
>>>       bool
>>>
>>> +config IRQ_SIM
>>> +     bool
>> You could make this tristate, but then the handling of the
>> users would get complex so perhaps given it's so small boolean
>> is the way to go.
>>
>
>Nah, irq_work is built-in to at even greater size. Let's just leave it
>like this, especially when only testing modules select it.
>
Fair enough.

>Thanks,
>Bartosz

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irq/irq_sim: add a simple interrupt simulator  framework Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> - 2017-08-12 13:50 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irq/irq_sim: add a simple interrupt simulator framework Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> - 2017-08-14 12:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] irq/irq_sim: add a simple interrupt simulator framework Jonathan Cameron <jic23@jic23.retrosnub.co.uk> - 2017-08-14 12:10 +0200

csiph-web