Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1712621
| From | "Tangchen (UVP)" <tang.chen@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | RE: 答复: [iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error |
| Date | 2017-08-16 05:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ueWSt-1ER-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uelJg-3wX-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uepjQ-5KP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uezCx-3JS-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ueRSN-6La-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> On Tue, 2017-08-15 at 02:16 +0000, Tangchen (UVP) wrote:
> > But I'm not using mq, and I run into these two problems in a non-mq system.
> > The patch you pointed out is fix for mq, so I don't think it can resolve this
> problem.
> >
> > IIUC, mq is for SSD ? I'm not using ssd, so mq is disabled.
>
> Hello Tangchen,
>
> Please post replies below the original e-mail instead of above - that is the reply
> style used on all Linux-related mailing lists I know of. From
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style:
>
> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Hi Bart,
Thanks for the reply. Will post the reply in e-mail. :)
>
> Regarding your question: sorry but I quoted the wrong commit in my previous
> e-mail. The commit I should have referred to is 255ee9320e5d ("scsi: Make
> __scsi_remove_device go straight from BLOCKED to DEL"). That patch not only
> affects scsi-mq but also the single-queue code in the SCSI core.
OK, I'll try this one. Thx.
>
> blk-mq/scsi-mq was introduced for SSDs but is not only intended for SSDs.
> The plan is to remove the blk-sq/scsi-sq code once the blk-mq/scsi-mq code
> works at least as fast as the single queue code for all supported devices.
> That includes hard disks.
OK, thanks for tell me this.
>
> Bart.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error "Tangchen (UVP)" <tang.chen@huawei.com> - 2017-08-14 13:30 +0200
Re: [iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> - 2017-08-14 17:20 +0200
答复: [iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error "Tangchen (UVP)" <tang.chen@huawei.com> - 2017-08-15 04:20 +0200
Re: 答复: [iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com> - 2017-08-15 23:50 +0200
RE: 答复: [iscsi] Deadlock occurred when network is in error "Tangchen (UVP)" <tang.chen@huawei.com> - 2017-08-16 05:10 +0200
csiph-web