Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1707054
| From | "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH net] Revert "vhost: cache used event for better performance" |
| Date | 2017-08-09 06:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ucqWJ-1RX-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <u7uoj-LY-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7uHE-SQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7x2N-2we-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8PTH-563-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucp4C-Fu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:38:10AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > I think don't think current code can work well if vq.num is grater than > 2^15. Since all cached idx is u16. This looks like a bug which needs to be > fixed. That's a limitation of virtio 1.0. > > * else if the interval of vq.num is [2^15, 2^16): > > the logic in the original patch (809ecb9bca6a9) suffices > > * else (= less than 2^15) (optional): > > checking only (vring_need_event(vq->last_used_event, new + vq->num, new) > > would suffice. > > > > Am I missing something, or is this irrelevant? Could you pls repost the suggestion copying virtio-dev mailing list (subscriber only, sorry about that, but host/guest ABI discussions need to copy that list)? > Looks not, I think this may work. Let me do some test. > > Thanks I think that at this point it's prudent to add a feature bit as the virtio spec does not require to never move the event index back.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH net] Revert "vhost: cache used event for better performance" Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> - 2017-08-09 04:40 +0200 Re: [PATCH net] Revert "vhost: cache used event for better performance" "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> - 2017-08-09 06:40 +0200
csiph-web