Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1706980
| From | David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier |
| Date | 2017-08-09 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ucnvQ-7US-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ubRcB-10r-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uc0SB-87I-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2017 02:46:16 +0200 > On 08/07/2017 04:21 PM, Edward Cree wrote: >> This series simplifies alignment tracking, generalises bounds tracking >> and >> fixes some bounds-tracking bugs in the BPF verifier. Pointer >> arithmetic on >> packet pointers, stack pointers, map value pointers and context >> pointers has >> been unified, and bounds on these pointers are only checked when the >> pointer >> is dereferenced. >> Operations on pointers which destroy all relation to the original >> pointer >> (such as multiplies and shifts) are disallowed if >> !env->allow_ptr_leaks, >> otherwise they convert the pointer to an unknown scalar and feed it to >> the >> normal scalar arithmetic handling. >> Pointer types have been unified with the corresponding >> adjusted-pointer types >> where those existed (e.g. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE[_ADJ] or FRAME_PTR vs >> PTR_TO_STACK); similarly, CONST_IMM and UNKNOWN_VALUE have been >> unified into >> SCALAR_VALUE. >> Pointer types (except CONST_PTR_TO_MAP, PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL and >> PTR_TO_PACKET_END, which do not allow arithmetic) have a 'fixed >> offset' and >> a 'variable offset'; the former is used when e.g. adding an immediate >> or a >> known-constant register, as long as it does not overflow. Otherwise >> the >> latter is used, and any operation creating a new variable offset >> creates a >> new 'id' (and, for PTR_TO_PACKET, clears the 'range'). >> SCALAR_VALUEs use the 'variable offset' fields to track the range of >> possible >> values; the 'fixed offset' should never be set on a scalar. > > Been testing and reviewing the series over the last several days, > looks > reasonable to me as far as I can tell. Thanks for all the hard work on > unifying this, Edward! > > Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Series applied, thanks everyone!
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 07/12] selftests/bpf: add test for bogus operations on pointers Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 03/12] bpf/verifier: more concise register state logs for constant var_off Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 05/12] selftests/bpf: rewrite test_align Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 06/12] selftests/bpf: add a test to test_align Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: don't try to access past MAX_PACKET_OFF in test_verifier Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 04/12] selftests/bpf: change test_verifier expectations Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 09/12] selftests/bpf: add tests for subtraction & negative numbers Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:30 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 11/12] Documentation: describe the new eBPF verifier value tracking behaviour Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 12/12] bpf/verifier: increase complexity limit to 128k Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:40 +0200
[PATCH v5 net-next 10/12] selftests/bpf: variable offset negative tests Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> - 2017-08-07 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2017-08-08 02:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 00/12] bpf: rewrite value tracking in verifier David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> - 2017-08-09 03:00 +0200
csiph-web