Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1707862
| From | Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: new ELF marking |
| Date | 2017-08-09 22:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ucFVN-3Rs-33@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <ucCOh-1QT-85@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucDTX-2tC-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucEdj-2Fa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucEmZ-2It-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <ucEwG-30X-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
> > > > I believe this would only be an output bit, but I'm not sure how it > > would be wired into binutils. Kostya, do you know any details about > > how AddressSanitizer might be able to create this ELF note? I don't, hopefully H.J's suggestion works. Will it be backward compatible? (i.e. will the binaries built in the new way work on the old kernels?) Thanks! --kcc > > > if it is an output only bit, "-z fobar" should work, like > > -z ibt Generate GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_IBT > -z shstk Generate GNU_PROPERTY_X86_FEATURE_1_SHSTK > > Or you can put it in the input file and linker will copy it to output, like > GNU_PROPERTY_STACK_SIZE.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
new ELF marking Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-08-09 19:10 +0200
Re: new ELF marking "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 19:20 +0200
Re: new ELF marking Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-08-09 20:30 +0200
Re: new ELF marking "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 20:50 +0200
Re: new ELF marking Kees Cook <keescook@google.com> - 2017-08-09 21:00 +0200
Re: new ELF marking "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 21:10 +0200
Re: new ELF marking Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com> - 2017-08-09 22:40 +0200
Re: new ELF marking "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> - 2017-08-09 23:30 +0200
Re: new ELF marking Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com> - 2017-08-10 00:40 +0200
csiph-web