Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1707379
| From | Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [patch v2 0/2] |
| Date | 2017-08-09 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ucAjo-bt-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <ubR2W-W5-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 05:17:45PM +0300, Oleksandr Shamray wrote:
> When a need raise up to use JTAG interface for system's devices
> programming or CPU debugging, it could be done from the external
> JTAG master controller.
>
> For such purpose, usually the user layer
> application implements jtag protocol or using a proprietary
> connection to vendor hardware.
> This method is slow and not generic.
>
> We propose to implement general JTAG interface and infrastructure
> to communicate with user layer application.
Hi Oleksandr
You might find this discussion interesting:
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/ksummit-discuss/2017-August/004721.html
You are defining a new ABI here, so linux-abi should be involved in
the discussion of these patches.
Andrew
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[patch v2 0/2] Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@mellanox.com> - 2017-08-07 16:20 +0200 Re: [patch v2 0/2] Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> - 2017-08-09 16:40 +0200 Re: [patch v2 0/2] Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2017-08-10 17:20 +0200
csiph-web