Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1705968
| From | Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression |
| Date | 2017-08-08 04:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uc2ro-1eJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u9Wq6-6U6-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uc1vk-wk-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 09:19:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -19.3% regression of will-it-scale.per_process_ops due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 76742700225cad9df49f05399381ac3f1ec3dc60 ("mm: fix MADV_[FREE|DONTNEED] TLB flush miss problem")
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nadav-Amit/mm-migrate-prevent-racy-access-to-tlb_flush_pending/20170802-205715
>
>
> in testcase: will-it-scale
> on test machine: 88 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz with 64G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> nr_task: 16
> mode: process
> test: brk1
> cpufreq_governor: performance
>
> test-description: Will It Scale takes a testcase and runs it from 1 through to n parallel copies to see if the testcase will scale. It builds both a process and threads based test in order to see any differences between the two.
> test-url: https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale
Thanks for the report.
Could you explain what kinds of workload you are testing?
Does it calls frequently madvise(MADV_DONTNEED) in parallel on multiple
threads?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v6 6/7] mm: fix MADV_[FREE|DONTNEED] TLB flush miss problem Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> - 2017-08-02 09:40 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-08-08 04:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 06:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-08-08 08:00 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-08-08 10:10 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> - 2017-08-09 03:30 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com> - 2017-08-09 05:10 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-08-10 06:20 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> - 2017-08-10 06:20 +0200
Re: [lkp-robot] [mm] 7674270022: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -19.3% regression Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> - 2017-08-10 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v6 6/7] mm: fix MADV_[FREE|DONTNEED] TLB flush miss problem Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-11 15:40 +0200
csiph-web