Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1705715
| From | Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations |
| Date | 2017-08-07 19:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <ubTxM-2Qn-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u99fI-JN-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubLgS-5Fs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <ubT4M-2E7-71@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
I hope this will finally enable thread local support to work in a sane way in gcc so that we can actually use it in kernel space and get rid of all the this_cpu_xxx() macros? And thread local RMVs primitives may actually be provided by gcc and be usable in user space so that we can write user space code with effective cpu local variable access?
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-08-07 10:10 +0200
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-07 18:30 +0200
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-08-07 19:00 +0200
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-08-07 19:40 +0200
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2017-08-07 21:10 +0200
Re: FSGSBASE ABI considerations Stas Sergeev <stsp@list.ru> - 2017-08-08 00:20 +0200
csiph-web