Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1703550
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist |
| Date | 2017-08-04 02:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uayc1-7iU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uahbb-3Vp-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaxzl-72m-31@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaxJ0-76G-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 3 Aug 2017 16:25:46 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 4:11 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > Where is this INIT_LIST_HEAD()? > > I think it's this one: > > list_del_init(&info->shrinklist); > > in shmem_unused_huge_shrink(). OK. > > I'm not sure I'm understanding this. AFAICT all the list operations to > > which you refer are synchronized under spin_lock(&sbinfo->shrinklist_lock)? > > No, notice how shmem_unused_huge_shrink() does the > > list_move(&info->shrinklist, &to_remove); > > and > > list_move(&info->shrinklist, &list); > > to move to (two different) private lists under the shrinklist_lock, > but once it is on that private "list/to_remove" list, it is then > accessed outside the locked region. So the code is using sbinfo->shrinklist_lock to protect sbinfo->shrinklist AND to protect all the per-inode info->shrinklist's. Except it didn't get the coverage complete. Presumably it's too expensive to extend sbinfo->shrinklist_lock coverage in shmem_unused_huge_shrink() (or is it? - this is huge pages). An alternative would be to add a new shmem_inode_info.shrinklist_lock whose mandate is to protect shmem_inode_info.shrinklist. > Honestly, I don't love this situation, or the patch, but I think the > patch is likely the right thing to do. Well, we could view the premature droppage of sbinfo->shrinklist_lock in shmem_unused_huge_shrink() to be a performance optimization and put some big fat comments in there explaining what's going on. But it's tricky and it's not known that such an optimization is warranted.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-08-03 07:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-08-04 01:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-08-04 01:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-08-04 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> - 2017-08-04 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH] mm: fix list corruptions on shmem shrinklist Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> - 2017-08-04 20:10 +0200
csiph-web