Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1703544
| From | Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] of/platform: Generalize /reserved-memory handling |
| Date | 2017-08-04 01:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaxSG-7aD-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uaewF-224-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaewG-224-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaspZ-3iy-27@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu 03 Aug 10:40 PDT 2017, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/of/platform.c b/drivers/of/platform.c
[..]
> > + rmem_nodes = of_find_node_by_path("/reserved-memory");
> > + for_each_available_child_of_node(rmem_nodes, node) {
> > + ret = of_device_compatible_match(node, rmem_compats);
> > + if (ret)
>
> I would just do:
>
> for_each_matching_node(node, ...)
> of_platform_device_create(node, NULL, NULL);
>
> I don't think the kernel has to validate that ramoops and any others
> we add are children of /reserved-memory. We should only have those
> compatibles located there and any other location would be an error.
>
Okay, looks reasonable.
Will update and resend once I know your decision on 2/5.
Regards,
Bjorn
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 1/5] of/platform: Generalize /reserved-memory handling Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-08-03 05:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] of/platform: Generalize /reserved-memory handling Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2017-08-03 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] of/platform: Generalize /reserved-memory handling Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2017-08-04 01:40 +0200
csiph-web