Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1702838

Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container?

From Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container?
Date 2017-08-03 11:40 +0200
Message-ID <uakLL-6tI-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <u6HQC-2Si-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u77rH-2RA-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9dsZ-3oE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9XPc-7SS-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <uakC7-6qh-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu 03-08-17 17:22:37, Joey Lee wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:01:43AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 31-07-17 15:38:45, Joey Lee wrote:
[...]
> > > So, the behavior is:
> > > 
> > > Kernel received ejection event, set _Eject_ flag on container object
> > >   -> Kernel sends offline events to all children devices
> > >     -> User space performs cleaning jobs and offlines each child device
> > >       -> Kernel detects all children offlined
> > > 	-> Kernel removes objects and calls power off(_EJ0)
> > 
> > Yes this is what I've had in mind. It is the "kernel detects..." part
> > which is not implemented now and that requires us to do the explicit
> > eject from userspace, correct?
> >
> 
> Yes, the _Eject_ flag and _detects_ part are not implemented now. 
> 
> In this approach, kernel still relies on user space to trigger the
> offline. The ejection process is still not transparent to user space.
> Is it what you want?

But as long as there is no auto-offlining then there is no other choice
no? Besides that userspace even shouldn't care about the fact that the
eject is in progress. That is a BIOS->OS deal AFAIU. All the userspace
cares about is the proper cleanup of the resources and that happens at
the offline time.

> > > If anyone onlined one of the children devices in the term of waiting
> > > userland offlines all children, then the _Eject_ flag will be clean
> > > and ejection process will be interrupted. In this situation, administrator
> > > needs to trigger ejection event again.
> > 
> > yes
> > 
> > > Do you think that the race hurts anything?
> > 
> > What kind of race?
> 
> User space set a child online before all childreen offlined, then
> the _Eject_ flag is cleaned and the ejection process is interrupted.

Is this really a race though? Kernel will always have a full picture and
if userspace wants to online some part then the eject cannot succeed.
This is something that a userspace driver eject cannot possibly handle.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-08-02 11:10 +0200
  Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container? joeyli <jlee@suse.com> - 2017-08-03 11:30 +0200
    Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-08-03 11:40 +0200
      Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container? joeyli <jlee@suse.com> - 2017-08-03 12:00 +0200
        Re: A udev rule to serve the change event of ACPI container? Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> - 2017-08-03 13:30 +0200

csiph-web