Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1704224

Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/vc4: Avoid using vrefresh==0 mode in DSI htotal math.

From Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/vc4: Avoid using vrefresh==0 mode in DSI htotal math.
Date 2017-08-04 23:20 +0200
Message-ID <uaSaK-3SH-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u4HUJ-7vU-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaGCB-4L1-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> writes:

> On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 14:05:05 -0700
> Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> wrote:
>
>> The incoming mode might have a missing vrefresh field if it came from
>> drmModeSetCrtc(), which the kernel is supposed to calculate using
>> drm_mode_vrefresh().  We could either use that or the adjusted_mode's
>> original vrefresh value.
>> 
>> However, we can maintain a more exact vrefresh value (not just the
>> integer approximation), by scaling by the ratio of our clocks.
>> 
>> v2: Use math suggested by Andrzej Hajda instead.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c | 3 ++-
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
>> index 629d372633e6..57213f4e3c72 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_dsi.c
>> @@ -866,7 +866,8 @@ static bool vc4_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>>  	adjusted_mode->clock = pixel_clock_hz / 1000 + 1;
>>  
>>  	/* Given the new pixel clock, adjust HFP to keep vrefresh the same. */
>> -	adjusted_mode->htotal = pixel_clock_hz / (mode->vrefresh * mode->vtotal);
>> +	adjusted_mode->htotal = (pixel_clock_hz / 1000 * mode->htotal /
>> +				 mode->clock);
>
> Hm, I'm not sure I understand this. Shouldn't we have something like:
>
> 	adjusted_mode->htotal = (adjusted_mode->clock * mode->htotal) /
> 				mode->clock;
>
> Is there a reason for doing '+ 1' when you calculate the adjusted
> pixel clock rate but not here?

We're actually expecting to get within epsilon of pixel_clock_hz, but we
have to bump our clk_set_rate() to a higher value because the clock
driver will give you a bad divider if you ask for anything less than the
rate it can provide.

How about I don't increment the adjusted_mode->clock (since it'll be
userspace visible I think), and instead move that and the "Round up"
comment to the clk_set_rate()?

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/vc4: Avoid using vrefresh==0 mode in DSI  htotal math. Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-08-04 11:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/vc4: Avoid using vrefresh==0 mode in DSI htotal math. Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net> - 2017-08-04 23:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] drm/vc4: Avoid using vrefresh==0 mode in DSI  htotal math. Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> - 2017-08-09 16:50 +0200

csiph-web