Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1704238

[PATCH] [RFC] tpm_tis: tpm_tcg_flush() after iowrite*()s

From Haris Okanovic <haris.okanovic@ni.com>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] [RFC] tpm_tis: tpm_tcg_flush() after iowrite*()s
Date 2017-08-05 00:00 +0200
Message-ID <uaSNr-47E-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


I have a latency issue using a SPI-based TPM chip with tpm_tis driver
from non-rt usermode application, which induces ~400 us latency spikes
in cyclictest (Intel Atom E3940 system, PREEMPT_RT_FULL kernel).

The spikes are caused by a stalling ioread8() operation, following a
sequence of 30+ iowrite8()s to the same address. I believe this happens
because the writes are cached (in cpu or somewhere along the bus), which
gets flushed on the first LOAD instruction (ioread*()) that follows.

The enclosed change appears to fix this issue: read the TPM chip's
access register (status code) after every iowrite*() operation.

I believe this works because it amortize the cost of flushing data to
chip across multiple instructions. However, I don't have any direct
evidence to support this theory.

Does this seem like a reasonable theory?

Any feedback on the change (a better way to do it, perhaps)?

Thanks,
Haris Okanovic

https://github.com/harisokanovic/linux/tree/dev/hokanovi/tpm-latency-spike-fix-rfc
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index c7e1384f1b08..5cdbfec0ad67 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -89,6 +89,19 @@ static inline int is_itpm(struct acpi_device *dev)
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL
+/*
+ * Flushes previous iowrite*() operations to chip so that a subsequent
+ * ioread*() won't stall a cpu.
+ */
+static void tpm_tcg_flush(struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy)
+{
+	ioread8(phy->iobase + TPM_ACCESS(0));
+}
+#else
+#define tpm_tcg_flush do { } while(0)
+#endif
+
 static int tpm_tcg_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
 			      u8 *result)
 {
@@ -104,8 +117,10 @@ static int tpm_tcg_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
 {
 	struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_tcg_phy(data);
 
-	while (len--)
+	while (len--) {
 		iowrite8(*value++, phy->iobase + addr);
+		tpm_tcg_flush(phy);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -130,6 +145,7 @@ static int tpm_tcg_write32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 value)
 	struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_tcg_phy(data);
 
 	iowrite32(value, phy->iobase + addr);
+	tpm_tcg_flush(phy);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.13.2

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] [RFC] tpm_tis: tpm_tcg_flush() after iowrite*()s Haris Okanovic <haris.okanovic@ni.com> - 2017-08-05 00:00 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tpm_tis: tpm_tcg_flush() after iowrite*()s Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> - 2017-08-07 17:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] [RFC] tpm_tis: tpm_tcg_flush() after iowrite*()s Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> - 2017-08-09 00:00 +0200

csiph-web