Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1703769
| From | "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup |
| Date | 2017-08-04 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <uaFQd-4tx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u9GEH-5cQ-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9GEG-5cQ-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <uaszE-3m4-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Vince,
Thanks for taking a look.
On 2017/08/03 01:57PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2017, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
>
> > Add a new option 'signal_on_wakeup' to request for a signal to be
> > delivered on ring buffer wakeup controlled through watermark and
> > {wakeup_events, wakeup_watermark}. HUP is signaled on exit.
> >
> > Setting signal_on_wakeup disables use of IOC_REFRESH to control signal
> > delivery, instead relying on IOC_ENABLE/DISABLE.
>
> so I probably missed the original thread on this new interface, but why is
> IOC_REFRESH not being used?
IOC_REFRESH is used to control the number of overflows before disabling
the event. It works outside of perf_event_attr in the sense that it
enables POLL_IN on each overflow and user specifies the number of
overflows after which to disable the event as part of the ioctl (when
HUP is signaled).
However, signal_on_wakeup is designed to work with the values in the
perf_event_attr structure itself. wakeup_events controls the number of
events after which to signal POLL_IN. signal_on_wakeup itself needs to
be specified in the perf_event_attr. As such, I felt it is better to
have all control through perf_event_attr.
But, if you think having IOC_REFRESH available in this scenario is
useful, we can revisit this. Ideally, we would have separate ioctls to
control signal delivery separate from perf_event_attr, but I am not sure
how useful that would be.
>
> For new interfaces like this it's also nice to have some text that can be
> added to the perf_event_open() manpage, especially if there's weird
> conditions like this.
Sure -- I will send an update to the manpage once this series gets
accepted.
Thanks,
Naveen
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH v2 0/2] Notifications for perf sideband events "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 16:50 +0200
[PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu> - 2017-08-03 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-04 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-04 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel/events: Add option to notify through signals on wakeup "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-04 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/events: Add option to enable counting sideband events in wakeup_events "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-01 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/events: Add option to enable counting sideband events in wakeup_events Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-04 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] kernel/events: Add option to enable counting sideband events in wakeup_events "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-08-04 20:20 +0200
csiph-web