Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1700611
| From | Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] futex: split PI support to a file of its own |
| Date | 2017-08-01 06:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9wYF-6ZP-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u8rRn-5Cw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9dMl-3vs-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > But I really do not agree with your reasoning about easier to understand > and maintain. I have the dubious pleasure to stare into that code on a > regular base. PI and non PI share a lot of code and it's really not helping > to have two separate files to stare at. That makes following the PI code > even harder than it is already. So I rather like to see that PI code in an > #ifdef block and not split out into its own file. OK. And in fact I think I now managed to keep #ifdef's to a very small number, counting on dead code elimination instead. Please see next patch. > Please provide a diffstat along with the patch next time. Hmmm... was supposed to be there. For the record it was: include/linux/futex.h | 7 +- init/Kconfig | 7 +- kernel/futex.c | 1559 +----------------------------------------- kernel/futex_pi.c | 1563 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 1598 insertions(+), 1538 deletions(-) Admitedly not small. But when PI is disabled then futex.o shrinks by roughly the half of its original size. So a lot of code is dedicated to PI. Nicolas
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH] futex: split PI support to a file of its own Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> - 2017-08-01 06:30 +0200
csiph-web