Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1700548
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected |
| Date | 2017-08-01 03:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9tHr-4Mv-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <tVLEd-3Fl-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u81kd-4Lf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9sBH-4b7-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Monday, July 31, 2017 04:46:42 PM Doug Smythies wrote: > On 2017.07.28 05:45 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > > > > After commit f8475cef9008 "x86: use common aperfmperf_khz_on_cpu() to > > calculate KHz using APERF/MPERF" the scaling_cur_freq policy attribute > > in sysfs only behaves as expected on x86 with APERF/MPERF registers > > available when it is read from at least twice in a row. The value > > returned by the first read may not be meaningful, because the > > computations in there use cached values from the previous iteration > > of aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() which may be stale. > > > > To prevent that from happening, modify arch_freq_get_on_cpu() to > > call aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() twice, with a short delay between > > these calls, if the previous invocation of aperfmperf_snapshot_khz() > > was too far back in the past (specifically, more that 1s ago). > > ...[deleted the rest]... > > This patch seems to work fine and addresses my complaints from last week. > Thanks. Thanks for the confirmation! Rafael
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RE: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@telus.net> - 2017-08-01 01:50 +0200 Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: x86: Make scaling_cur_freq behave more as expected "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2017-08-01 03:00 +0200
csiph-web