Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1700087
| From | Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin |
| Date | 2017-07-31 16:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9jRN-7nb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u8tqa-6KR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9jf4-6U3-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 31/07/2017 15:42, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> If the vcpu(me) exit due to request a usermode spinlock, then >> the spinlock-holder may be preempted in usermode or kernmode. >> But if the vcpu(me) is in kernmode, then the holder must be >> preempted in kernmode, so we should choose a vcpu in kernmode >> as the most eligible candidate. > > That seems to preclude any form of locking between userspace and kernel > (which probably wouldn't be Linux). Are you sure that this form of > construct is not used anywhere? I have the feeling this patch could > break this scenario... It's just a heuristic; it would only be broken if you overcommit, and it would be just as broken as if KVM didn't implement directed yield at all. Paolo
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng(Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-07-29 08:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 13:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-07-31 14:20 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 14:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-01 05:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-08-01 10:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 14:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-07-31 15:10 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Christoffer Dall <cdall@linaro.org> - 2017-07-31 15:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 19:40 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> - 2017-08-01 09:00 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin "Longpeng (Mike)" <longpeng2@huawei.com> - 2017-08-01 04:30 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 15:50 +0200
Re: [RFC] KVM: optimize the kvm_vcpu_on_spin Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2017-07-31 16:30 +0200
csiph-web