Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1700037
| From | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync |
| Date | 2017-07-31 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9iM2-6Kb-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <u7vkm-1ob-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7FWq-82k-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <u826D-5lO-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <u89KO-1TI-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8iO5-7Od-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi Vikram, On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 12:09:38PM -0700, Vikram Mulukutla wrote: > On 2017-07-28 02:28, Will Deacon wrote: > >On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 06:10:34PM -0700, Vikram Mulukutla wrote: > > <snip> > > >> > >>I think we should have this discussion now - I brought this up earlier > >>[1] > >>and I promised a test case that I completely forgot about - but here it > >>is (attached). Essentially a Big CPU in an acquire-check-release loop > >>will have an unfair advantage over a little CPU concurrently attempting > >>to acquire the same lock, in spite of the ticket implementation. If the > >>Big > >>CPU needs the little CPU to make forward progress : livelock. > >> > > <snip> > > >> > >>One solution was to use udelay(1) in such loops instead of cpu_relax(), > >>but > >>that's not very 'relaxing'. I'm not sure if there's something we could > >>do > >>within the ticket spin-lock implementation to deal with this. > > > >Does bodging cpu_relax to back-off to wfe after a while help? The event > >stream will wake it up if nothing else does. Nasty patch below, but I'd be > >interested to know whether or not it helps. > > > >Will > > > This does seem to help. Here's some data after 5 runs with and without the > patch. Blimey, that does seem to make a difference. Shame it's so ugly! Would you be able to experiment with other values for CPU_RELAX_WFE_THRESHOLD? I had it set to 10000 in the diff I posted, but that might be higher than optimal. It would be interested to see if it correlates with num_possible_cpus() for the highly contended case. Will
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-26 16:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com> - 2017-07-27 03:40 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> - 2017-07-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-28 03:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-28 11:30 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-28 21:10 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com> - 2017-07-31 13:30 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com> - 2017-08-01 09:40 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-04 01:40 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync qiaozhou <qiaozhou@asrmicro.com> - 2017-08-04 05:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-31 15:20 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-08-04 01:30 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-28 11:30 +0200
Re: [Question]: try to fix contention between expire_timers and try_to_del_timer_sync Vikram Mulukutla <markivx@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-28 21:20 +0200
csiph-web