Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1700969
| From | Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads |
| Date | 2017-08-01 14:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u9Etc-3XT-17@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <u8w4F-7n-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u8Ykh-230-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9ep4-3Xg-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9nVo-1jR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <u9AfU-pF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, Aug 01, 2017 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 02:41:42PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:31:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > So could you start by describing what actual statistics we need? Because > > > as is the scheduler already does a gazillion stats and why can't re > > > repurpose some of those? > > > > If that's possible, that would be great of course. > > > > We want to be able to tell how many tasks in a domain (the system or a > > memory cgroup) are inside a memdelay section as opposed to how many > > And you haven't even defined wth a memdelay section is yet.. It's what a task is in after it calls memdelay_enter() and before it calls memdelay_leave(). Tasks mark themselves to be in a memory section when they know to perform work that is necessary due to a lack of memory, such as waiting for a refault or a direct reclaim invocation. From the patch: +/** + * memdelay_enter - mark the beginning of a memory delay section + * @flags: flags to handle nested memdelay sections + * + * Marks the calling task as being delayed due to a lack of memory, + * such as waiting for a workingset refault or performing reclaim. + */ +/** + * memdelay_leave - mark the end of a memory delay section + * @flags: flags to handle nested memdelay sections + * + * Marks the calling task as no longer delayed due to memory. + */ where a reclaim callsite looks like this (decluttered): memdelay_enter() nr_reclaimed = do_try_to_free_pages() memdelay_leave() That's what defines the "unproductive due to lack of memory" state of a task. Time spent in that state weighed against time spent while the task is productive - runnable or in iowait while not in a memdelay section - gives the memory health of the task. And the system and cgroup states/health can be derived from task states as described: > > are in a "productive" state such as runnable or iowait. Then derive > > from that whether the domain as a whole is unproductive (all non-idle > > tasks memdelayed), or partially unproductive (some delayed, but CPUs > > are productive or there are iowait tasks). Then derive the percentages > > of walltime the domain spends partially or fully unproductive. > > > > For that we need per-domain counters for > > > > 1) nr of tasks in memdelay sections > > 2) nr of iowait or runnable/queued tasks that are NOT inside > > memdelay sections
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-07-31 20:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-07-31 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-07-31 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> - 2017-08-01 04:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-08-01 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm/sched: memdelay: memory health interface for systems and workloads Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> - 2017-08-01 14:30 +0200
csiph-web