Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1699010
| From | Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG_CTL |
| Date | 2017-07-28 20:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u8il4-7oj-27@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7OZH-5qs-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7OZH-5qs-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 07/27, Abhishek Sahu wrote: > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > index 47a1da3..e6cde2d 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c > @@ -118,7 +118,10 @@ void clk_alpha_pll_configure(struct clk_alpha_pll *pll, struct regmap *regmap, > regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_L_VAL, config->l); > regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_ALPHA_VAL, config->alpha); > regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL, config->config_ctl_val); > - regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U, config->config_ctl_hi_val); > + > + if (pll->flags & SUPPORTS_64BIT_CONFIG_CTL) > + regmap_write(regmap, off + PLL_CONFIG_CTL_U, > + config->config_ctl_hi_val); Is there a hole there? I mean a RAZ/WI register so we can just keep writing it and not care? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG_CTL Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-27 13:20 +0200
Re: [RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG_CTL Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-28 20:40 +0200
Re: [RFC 02/12] clk: qcom: flag for 64 bit CONFIG_CTL Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> - 2017-07-30 15:10 +0200
csiph-web