Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1699036

[PATCH] f2fs: don't need to wait for node writes for atomic write

Path csiph.com!goblin3!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH] f2fs: don't need to wait for node writes for atomic write
Date Fri, 28 Jul 2017 21:20:02 +0200
Message-ID <u8iXM-7RN-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
X-Original-To linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Dmarc-Filter OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1946E22B6E
Authentication-Results mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org
Authentication-Results mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=jaegeuk@kernel.org
X-Mailer git-send-email 2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
List-ID <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 55
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
X-Original-Cc Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
X-Original-Date Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:14:38 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID <20170728191438.34330-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>
X-Original-Sender linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Xref csiph.com linux.kernel:1699036

Show key headers only | View raw


We have a node chain to serialize node block writes, so if any IOs for
node block writes are reordered, we'll get broken node chain. IOWs,
roll-forward recovery will see all or none node blocks given fsync
mark.

E.g.,
Node chain consists of:
 N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> NFSYNC -> N1' -> N2' -> N'FSYNC

Reordered to:
1) N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> N2' -> NFSYNC -> N'FSYNC -> power-cut
2) N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> N1' -> NFSYNC -> power-cut
3) N1 -> N2 -> NFSYNC -> N1' -> N'FSYNC -> N3 -> power-cut
4) N1 -> NFSYNC -> N1' -> N2' -> N'FSYNC -> N3 -> power-cut

Roll-forward recovery can proceed to:
1) N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> NFSYNC -> X
2) N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> NFSYNC -> N1' -> X
3) N1 -> N2 -> N3 -> FSYNC -> N1' -> X
4) N1 -> X

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
---
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index a0413c951458..0246d19d96c3 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -274,9 +274,19 @@ static int f2fs_do_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
 		goto sync_nodes;
 	}
 
-	ret = wait_on_node_pages_writeback(sbi, ino);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+	/*
+	 * If it's atomic_write, it's just fine to keep write ordering. So
+	 * here we don't need to wait for node write completion, since we use
+	 * node chain which serializes node blocks. If one of node writes are
+	 * reordered, we can see simply broken chain, resulting in stopping
+	 * roll-forward recovery. It means we'll recover all or none node blocks
+	 * given fsync mark.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic) {
+		ret = wait_on_node_pages_writeback(sbi, ino);
+		if (ret)
+			goto out;
+	}
 
 	/* once recovery info is written, don't need to tack this */
 	remove_ino_entry(sbi, ino, APPEND_INO);
-- 
2.13.0.rc1.294.g07d810a77f-goog

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH] f2fs: don't need to wait for node writes for atomic write Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> - 2017-07-28 21:20 +0200

csiph-web