Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1696635
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups |
| Date | 2017-07-26 00:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7glk-i5-13@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u6ToJ-2fn-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u6ToK-2fn-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7cB4-6fC-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7dx9-6OD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 12:18:14 -0700 "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 02:12:20PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2017 14:44:31 -0700 > > "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > The handling of RCU's no-CBs CPUs has a maintenance headache, namely > > > that if call_rcu() is invoked with interrupts disabled, the rcuo kthread > > > wakeup must be defered to a point where we can be sure that scheduler > > > locks are not held. Of course, there are a lot of code paths leading > > > from an interrupts-disabled invocation of call_rcu(), and missing any > > > one of these can result in excessive callback-invocation latency, and > > > potentially even system hangs. > > > > What about using irq_work? That's what perf and ftrace use for such a > > case. > > I hadn't looked at irq_work before, thank you for the pointer! > > I nevertheless believe that timers work better in this particular case > because they can be cancelled (which appears to be the common case), they Is the common case here that it doesn't trigger? That is, the del_timer() will be called? > normally are not at all time-critical, and because running in softirq > is just fine -- no need to run out of the scheduling-clock interrupt. irq_work doesn't always use the scheduling clock. IIRC, it will simply trigger a interrupt (if the arch supports it), and the work will be done when interrupts are enabled (the interrupt that will do the work will trigger) > > Seem reasonable? Don't know. With irq_work, you just call it and forget about it. No need to mod or del timers. -- Steve
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/15] General fixes "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/15] rcu: Create reasonable API for do_exit() TASKS_RCU processing "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/15] rcu: use idle versions of swait to make idle-hack clear "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-25 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 21:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-26 00:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-27 01:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/15] rcu: Use timer as backstop for NOCB deferred wakeups "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 19:40 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add TPS() protection for _rcu_barrier_trace strings "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/15] rcu: Add TPS() protection for _rcu_barrier_trace strings Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-28 03:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/15] rcu: Add warning to rcu_idle_enter() for irqs enabled "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/15] sched,rcu: Make cond_resched() provide RCU quiescent state "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/15] swait: add idle variants which don't contribute to load average "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: Remove exports from rcu_idle_exit() and rcu_idle_enter() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Drive TASKS_RCU directly off of PREEMPT "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Drive TASKS_RCU directly off of PREEMPT Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-25 20:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/15] rcu: Drive TASKS_RCU directly off of PREEMPT "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 21:20 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/15] rcu: Add assertions verifying blocked-tasks list "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Add TPS() to event-traced strings "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/15] rcu: Add TPS() to event-traced strings Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2017-07-28 03:40 +0200
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/15] rcu: Move rcu.h to new trivial-function style "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-24 23:50 +0200
csiph-web