Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1696021

[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t

From Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Newsgroups linux.kernel
Subject [PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t
Date 2017-07-25 20:40 +0200
Message-ID <u7cUp-6m2-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <u7cUp-6m2-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


While not a crash test, this does provide two tight atomic_t and
refcount_t loops for performance comparisons:

	cd /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash
	perf stat -B -- cat <(echo ATOMIC_TIMING) > DIRECT
	perf stat -B -- cat <(echo REFCOUNT_TIMING) > DIRECT

Looking a CPU cycles is the best way to example the fast-path (rather
than instruction counts, since conditional jumps will be executed but
will be negligible due to branch-prediction).

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 drivers/misc/lkdtm.h          |  2 ++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c     |  2 ++
 drivers/misc/lkdtm_refcount.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
index 241d6f3a26dd..0b86947b31f5 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_DEC_SATURATED(void);
 void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_ADD_SATURATED(void);
 void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_DEC_AND_TEST_SATURATED(void);
 void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_SUB_AND_TEST_SATURATED(void);
+void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_TIMING(void);
+void lkdtm_ATOMIC_TIMING(void);
 
 /* lkdtm_rodata.c */
 void lkdtm_rodata_do_nothing(void);
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
index c3b045aec10e..5f949a05b307 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
@@ -234,6 +234,8 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
 	CRASHTYPE(REFCOUNT_ADD_SATURATED),
 	CRASHTYPE(REFCOUNT_DEC_AND_TEST_SATURATED),
 	CRASHTYPE(REFCOUNT_SUB_AND_TEST_SATURATED),
+	CRASHTYPE(REFCOUNT_TIMING),
+	CRASHTYPE(ATOMIC_TIMING),
 	CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_SIZE_TO),
 	CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_SIZE_FROM),
 	CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_HEAP_FLAG_TO),
diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_refcount.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_refcount.c
index 234d39a07a99..8bad7baf0119 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_refcount.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_refcount.c
@@ -306,3 +306,47 @@ void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_SUB_AND_TEST_SATURATED(void)
 
 	check_saturated(&sat);
 }
+
+/* Used to time the existing atomic_t when used for reference counting */
+void lkdtm_ATOMIC_TIMING(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	atomic_t count = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < INT_MAX; i++)
+		atomic_inc(&count);
+
+	for (i = INT_MAX; i >= 0; i--)
+		if (atomic_dec_and_test(&count))
+			break;
+
+	if (i != 0)
+		pr_err("atomic timing: out of sync up/down cycle: %u\n", i);
+	else
+		pr_info("atomic timing: done\n");
+}
+
+/*
+ * This can be compared to ATOMIC_TIMING when implementing fast refcount
+ * protections. Looking at the number of CPU cycles tells the real story
+ * about performance. For example:
+ *    cd /sys/kernel/debug/provoke-crash
+ *    perf stat -B -- cat <(echo REFCOUNT_TIMING) > DIRECT
+ */
+void lkdtm_REFCOUNT_TIMING(void)
+{
+	unsigned int i;
+	refcount_t count = REFCOUNT_INIT(1);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < INT_MAX; i++)
+		refcount_inc(&count);
+
+	for (i = INT_MAX; i >= 0; i--)
+		if (refcount_dec_and_test(&count))
+			break;
+
+	if (i != 0)
+		pr_err("refcount: out of sync up/down cycle: %u\n", i);
+	else
+		pr_info("refcount timing: done\n");
+}
-- 
2.7.4

Back to linux.kernel | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

[PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-25 20:40 +0200
  Re: [PATCH 2/2] lkdtm: Provide timing tests for atomic_t vs refcount_t Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - 2017-07-25 21:30 +0200

csiph-web