Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1698283
| From | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() |
| Date | 2017-07-27 21:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7WXg-1XP-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <u7xYS-37A-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7U95-8vc-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2017 09:46:08 -0700 Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> wrote:
> In codepaths that use the begin/retry interface for reading
> mems_allowed_seq with irqs disabled, there exists a race condition that
> stalls the patch process after only modifying a subset of the
> static_branch call sites.
>
> This problem manifested itself as a dead lock in the slub
> allocator, inside get_any_partial. The loop reads
> mems_allowed_seq value (via read_mems_allowed_begin),
> performs the defrag operation, and then verifies the consistency
> of mem_allowed via the read_mems_allowed_retry and the cookie
> returned by xxx_begin. The issue here is that both begin and retry
> first check if cpusets are enabled via cpusets_enabled() static branch.
> This branch can be rewritted dynamically (via cpuset_inc) if a new
> cpuset is created. The x86 jump label code fully synchronizes across
> all CPUs for every entry it rewrites. If it rewrites only one of the
> callsites (specifically the one in read_mems_allowed_retry) and then
> waits for the smp_call_function(do_sync_core) to complete while a CPU is
> inside the begin/retry section with IRQs off and the mems_allowed value
> is changed, we can hang. This is because begin() will always return 0
> (since it wasn't patched yet) while retry() will test the 0 against
> the actual value of the seq counter.
>
> The fix is to cache the value that's returned by cpusets_enabled() at the
> top of the loop, and only operate on the seqcount (both begin and retry) if
> it was true.
Tricky. Hence we should have a nice code comment somewhere describing
all of this.
> --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/jump_label.h>
>
> +struct cpuset_mems_cookie {
> + unsigned int seq;
> + bool was_enabled;
> +};
At cpuset_mems_cookie would be a good site - why it exists, what it
does, when it is used and how.
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[RFC PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-26 19:00 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com> - 2017-07-26 19:10 +0200
Re: [RFC PATCH] mm/slub: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-26 22:00 +0200
[PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-27 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-07-27 21:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-27 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> - 2017-07-27 22:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-27 23:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-07-28 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-28 10:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-28 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-07-28 16:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-28 19:00 +0200
[PATCH v3] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-31 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-31 06:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> - 2017-07-31 10:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v3] cpuset: fix a deadlock due to incomplete patching of cpusets_enabled() Dima Zavin <dmitriyz@waymo.com> - 2017-07-31 11:10 +0200
csiph-web