Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1697653
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.kernel |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option |
| Date | 2017-07-27 03:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <u7G65-85D-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <u7wJr-2ak-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7yLh-3p3-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7znY-3Tc-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7Bg5-54j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <u7BSO-5zh-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:11:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 08:37:23PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > ----- On Jul 26, 2017, at 2:30 PM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:01:15PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > >> ----- On Jul 26, 2017, at 11:42 AM, Paul E. McKenney paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 09:46:56AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > >> >> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 10:50:13PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > > >> >> > This would implement a MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED (or such) flag > > >> >> > for expedited process-local effect. This differs from the "SHARED" flag, > > >> >> > since the SHARED flag affects threads accessing memory mappings shared > > >> >> > across processes as well. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > I wonder if we could create a MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED behavior > > >> >> > by iterating on all memory mappings mapped into the current process, > > >> >> > and build a cpumask based on the union of all mm masks encountered ? > > >> >> > Then we could send the IPI to all cpus belonging to that cpumask. Or > > >> >> > am I missing something obvious ? > > >> >> > > >> >> I would readily object to such a beast. You far too quickly end up > > >> >> having to IPI everybody because of some stupid shared map or something > > >> >> (yes I know, normal DSOs are mapped private). > > >> > > > >> > Agreed, we should keep things simple to start with. The user can always > > >> > invoke sys_membarrier() from each process. > > >> > > >> Another alternative for a MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED would be rate-limiting > > >> per thread. For instance, we could add a new "ulimit" that would bound the > > >> number of expedited membarrier per thread that can be done per millisecond, > > >> and switch to synchronize_sched() whenever a thread goes beyond that limit > > >> for the rest of the time-slot. > > >> > > >> A RT system that really cares about not having userspace sending IPIs > > >> to all cpus could set the ulimit value to 0, which would always use > > >> synchronize_sched(). > > >> > > >> Thoughts ? > > > > > > The patch I posted reverts to synchronize_sched() in kernels booted with > > > rcupdate.rcu_normal=1. ;-) > > > > > > But who is pushing for multiple-process sys_membarrier()? Everyone I > > > have talked to is OK with it being local to the current process. > > > > I guess I'm probably the guilty one intending to do weird stuff in userspace ;) > > > > Here are my two use-cases: > > > > * a new multi-process liburcu flavor, useful if e.g. a set of processes are > > responsible for updating a shared memory data structure, and a separate set > > of processes read that data structure. The readers can be killed without ill > > effect on the other processes. The synchronization could be done by one > > multi-process liburcu flavor per reader process "group". > > > > * lttng-ust user-space ring buffers (shared across processes). > > > > Both rely on a shared memory mapping for communication between processes, and > > I would like to be able to issue a sys_membarrier targeting all CPUs that may > > currently touch the shared memory mapping. > > > > I don't really need a system-wide effect, but I would like to be able to target > > a shared memory mapping and efficiently do an expedited sys_membarrier on all > > cpus involved. > > > > With lttng-ust, the shared buffers can spawn across 1000+ processes, so > > asking each process to issue sys_membarrier would add lots of unneeded overhead, > > because this would issue lots of needless memory barriers. > > > > Thoughts ? > > Dealing explicitly with 1000+ processes sounds like no picnic. It instead > sounds like a job for synchronize_sched_expedited(). ;-) Actually... Mathieu, does your use case require unprivileged access to sys_membarrier()? Thanx, Paul
Back to linux.kernel | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-07-25 06:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-25 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-25 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 18:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-25 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 19:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-25 21:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-25 22:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-25 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-26 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-26 00:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-26 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-26 22:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 23:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 03:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> - 2017-07-27 14:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 12:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 15:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-26 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 10:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 15:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 15:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> - 2017-07-27 16:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 17:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> - 2017-07-26 11:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-26 17:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 12:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 15:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2017-07-27 15:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/5] sys_membarrier: Add expedited option "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2017-07-27 16:40 +0200
csiph-web